Although this was a very good gamut score, the poor color accuracy score means these colors might not be reproduced faithfully.Ī good judge of both the ink quality and a printer's ability to print a wide tonal range is the density of the blackest tone in a print. The colors notably missing are the blues and greens along the edge of the frame. The chart below displays the iP1800 profile as a three-dimensional color field within the Adobe RGB wire frame. Most of the other Canon printers, aside from the compact dye sublimation models, scored in this range. Aside from the high-end photo printers we've tested, namely the Epson R2400 and Canon Pro9500, this percentage was among the highest of the other printers to come thorough our labs. The stock Canon printer profile for the iP1800 achieved a respectable score, representing 55 percent of the Adobe RGB space, a total of 676,268 colors. Most printers come within the 40 th and 50 th percentiles, and a printer achieving upwards of 70 percent is excellent, seen only in high-end photo printers. The number of colors our test printer reproduces is converted into a percentage of the Adobe RGB space. We derived our scores for this test from a comparison with a known color space, Adobe RGB, which contains 1,225,088 colors. Most colors were consistently lighter, or less saturated than the original chart.Ĭolor gamut refers to the range of colors that a printer is capable of reproducing.
#Canon ip1800 driver software skin
Generally speaking, blues and greens had the most error, but skin tone color error values were high, too. A sample version (*not *one printed with the iP800) is shown below for reference. We then calculate the average color error from all of the error from the sixteen color patches. The chart is a digital version which is then printed with the test printer, in this case, the iP800. Both Canon inkjet printers tested, the Canon Pixma MP600 all-in-one and the Canon Pixma Pro9000, yielded lower error values.Ĭolor error is a measure of how far the printer’s representation of the color patches in the Gretag Macbeth Colorchecker chart strayed from the original values used to create the chart. Its delta E mean color error was quite high, at 9.86. This was disappointing for a Canon inkjet, but in the end, not surprising for a low-budget, two-cartridge, inkjet printer. The Pixma iP800 scored very low on our color accuracy test. We perform our speed tests using the highest quality setting, which is generally different than manufacturers' methods. Larger sizes, such as 8.5" x 11" prints, printed even slower, taking about 5 minutes each. The slower performance makes sense for a low-end printer, but this was well below all of the Canon printers that have been tested in our labs for 4" x 6" print scores. Of the three that we've tested, the iP1800 was the slowest, printing an average of one-third of a page per minute. Inkjet photo printers are generally among the slowest of any class of printers.
The Canon iP1800 scored very low in our photo print speed tests. It's made for printing photos at home, and it can also print documents. That said, that's not what this printer was made for. The iP1800's text quality was acceptable, but not something to be used for high-volume document output where clarity is critical. Another inkjet, the HP C5180 (on the left), an all-in-one photo printer, displays similar edge softness but less rich black than the iP1800. When compared to the Lexmark X342n (on the right), a monochrome laser, it's clear that the edges of the iP1800's text is relatively soft, not crisp like the laser output. Text clarity was decent, but not as good as most other printers tested, notably the all-in-one inkjets and especially the lasers, which are know for printing crisp text.īelow in the center image you'll see a sample character printed with the iP800. For a low-end inkjet, the iP1800 had respectable document times, despite its low score in this category.
The laser printer put them all to shame, but high speeds are the nature of laser printers. All of these times were exceeded by the all-in-one inkjets, especially the HP model.
#Canon ip1800 driver software pro
The iP1800 was a little faster than the pro photo printers when printing black text documents, but much slower when printing color graphics. We also threw a laser printer in there (HP 3600) to give a frame of reference. We haven't yet tested any comparable printers in price to the iP1800, so in the chart below, we've listed this printer alongside three all-in-one photo inkjets (Canon MP600, HP C5180, and Kodak EasyShare 5300) and two pro photo printers (Epson R2400 and Canon Pro9000). We separate out document printing speeds from photo speeds because there is usually such a large gulf between the two times in our tests.